In this book, the author Steven
Johnson, argues that innovative ideas come from the environments that
support free thinking and cross-disciplinary cooperation and knowledge exchange. Sure, no one can seriously dispute these
assertions. Do we need to read this book to know this? Not
really.
In general, the author's writing style reminded me books by Malcolm Gladwell. In both cases the authors literally are
cherry picking data that better fit their arguments. They never
bother to discuss opposite views or counter arguments.
For
example, here the author argues that cooperation is important for
good ideas but provides examples that goes against it, such as
Charles Darwin's work on origin of species or invention of Internet
by CERN scientist. In both cases ideas were crystallized in total
solitary mode.
Similarly, the author argues that Big cities
produce more inventions. However, it is not clear whether this is a
simply quantitative effect. Also, the author fails to discuss whether
every Big city produces similar number of inventions, or some cities
are better than others.
Finally, the author does not
articulate clearly the conditions that could foster innovations
(beyond cliche ideas about office design that in my opinion rather
helps to foster common gossip than innovation in an ordinary
sense).
Good ideas clearly don't come from this book.
posted by David Usharauli
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment